RIC: Research Interest Comparator

Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe, M.D.
Affiliation: San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
Email: not provided
Home Page: http://it.geocities.com/comet_milano/Home.htm
New This Month | New This Year | Abstract | Selected Publications | RIC Statistics Results - FULL MEDLINE:

Meta-analysis.
N Engl J Med 1987 Aug; 317(9)575-7.
Score: 1.799
Misleading meta-analysis. One incorrect meta-analysis does not invalidate them all.
M R Law ... N J Wald
BMJ 1995 Nov; 311(7015)1303.
Score: 1.625
"The challenge of meta-analysis": discussion. Indications and contra-indications for meta-analysis.
N Victor
J Clin Epidemiol 1995 Jan; 48(1)5-8.
Score: 1.625
Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: results of the 1993 meta-analysis.
N S Tobler
NIDA Res Monogr 1997 ; 170()5-68.
Score: 1.551
Meta-analysis.
N W Goodman
Anaesthesia 1997 Aug; 52(8)723-5.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
T C Chalmers
Lancet 1987 Jun; 1(8548)1492.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
M C Smith
NLN Publ 1988 Dec; (15-2233)77-91.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
C J Bulpitt
Lancet 1988 Jul; 2(8602)93-4.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
A I O'Flynn
Nurs Res 1982 Sep-Oct; 31(5)314-6.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis in evidence.
A N Atallah
Sao Paulo Med J 1997 Jul-Aug; 115(4)1465-6.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
B Choi
Ann Intern Med 1988 Jul; 109(1)83.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
A T Elliott
Nucl Med Commun 1994 Apr; 15(4)218-20.
Score: 1.469
Why meta-analysis?
Stephen Halpern
Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002 Jan-Feb; 27(1)3-5.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
S Pocock
Stat Methods Med Res 1993 ; 2(2)117-9.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
G D Murray
Br J Surg 1990 Mar; 77(3)243-4.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
S Neff
Ann Intern Med 1987 Nov; 107(5)791.
Score: 1.469
Whither meta-analysis?
Lancet 1987 Apr; 1(8538)897-8.
Score: 1.469
Below the fold. Meta-analysis.
Lancet 1999 Feb; 353(9151)509.
Score: 1.469
Re: Meta-analysis.
Nurs Res 1984 Mar-Apr; 33(2)86-7.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis.
G Fitzmaurice
Nutrition 1999 Feb; 15(2)174-6.
Score: 1.469
Meta-analysis under scrutiny.
Lancet 1997 Sep; 350(9079)675.
Score: 1.469
"The practice of meta-analysis": discussion. Meta-analysis of observational studies: a case study of work in progress.
V Beral
J Clin Epidemiol 1995 Jan; 48(1)165-6.
Score: 1.428
Meta-analysis and endocrinology.
D B Petitti
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1997 Mar; 26(1)31-44.
Score: 1.312
The first use of meta-analysis?
W Winkelstein
Am J Epidemiol 1998 Apr; 147(8)717.
Score: 1.272
Problems with meta-analysis.
P Herbison
N Z Med J 1999 Feb; 112(1081)38-41.
Score: 1.272
Pitfalls of meta-analysis.
K N Haque
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995 Nov; 73(3)F196.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis.
R W Hunter ... W P Soutter
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 Aug; 171(2)583-4.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis.
P Easterbrook ... J Berlin
Lancet 1993 Apr; 341(8850)965.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis in the breech.
C Mann
Science 1990 Aug; 249(4968)476-80.
Score: 1.272
Can meta-analysis be salvaged?
S Greenland
Am J Epidemiol 1994 Nov; 140(9)783-7.
Score: 1.272
Triptan meta-analysis.
Egilius L H Spierings
Headache 2002 Oct; 42(9)948.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis.
J Fanning ... R D Hilgers
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 Jul; 169(1)236-7.
Score: 1.272
Glossary on meta-analysis.
M Delgado-Rodríguez
J Epidemiol Community Health 2001 Aug; 55(8)534-6.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis.
J P Pignon ... R Arriagada
Lancet 1993 Apr; 341(8850)964-5.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis.
S Shapiro
Am J Epidemiol 1994 Nov; 140(9)771-8.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis: a review.
R Rosenthal
Psychosom Med 1991 May-Jun; 53(3)247-71.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis.
S Yusuf ... J Pogue
Lancet 1998 Jun; 351(9120)1960.
Score: 1.272
Chromium meta-analysis.
Mark F McCarty
Am J Clin Nutr 2003 Jul; 78(1)191-2; author reply 192-3.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis confounded.
P M Stell
Lancet 1992 Mar; 339(8793)623.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis.
D J Feuer ... J P Higgins
Palliat Med 1999 Sep; 13(5)433-7.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis under the microscope.
D L Weed
J Natl Cancer Inst 1997 Jul; 89(13)904-5.
Score: 1.272
Albumin meta-analysis.
E M Gibney
Ann Intern Med 2001 Dec; 135(11)1008-9.
Score: 1.272
The challenge of meta-analysis.
W O Spitzer
J Clin Epidemiol 1995 Jan; 48(1)1-4.
Score: 1.272
Quality of evidence in meta-analysis.
J Warner
Br J Psychiatry 2001 Jul; 179()79.
Score: 1.272
Techniques of meta-analysis.
D A Katerndahl
J Am Board Fam Pract 1993 Jul-Aug; 6(4)433-4.
Score: 1.272
Comments on meta-analysis.
A B Lowenfels
Am J Public Health 1989 Jan; 79(1)102-3.
Score: 1.272
Disturbed by meta-analysis?
K W Wachter
Science 1988 Sep; 241(4872)1407-8.
Score: 1.272
Meta-analysis and bouillabaisse.
W M Tierney
Ann Intern Med 1996 Sep; 125(6)519.
Score: 1.272
Synthesis of research findings through meta-analysis.
C A Mottola
Decubitus 1992 Sep; 5(5)48-50.
Score: 1.247
Meta-analysis at 20: retrospect and prospect.
K A Kavale
Eval Health Prof 1995 Dec; 18(4)349-69.
Score: 1.237
Meta-analysis of cigarette smoking, bone mineral density, and risk of hip fracture. Three studies were omitted from meta-analysis.
D J Torgerson ... M K Campbell
BMJ 1998 Mar; 316(7136)1017.
Score: 1.215
Response to: 'Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis' by S. Muncer (2002) Journal of Advanced Nursing 38, 274-280.
Ron Driver
J Adv Nurs 2002 Dec; 40(6)652-3.
Score: 1.179
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis.
F Song ... S Gilbody
BMJ 1998 Feb; 316(7129)471.
Score: 1.179
Meta-analysis in medical research: strong encouragement for higher quality in individual research efforts.
K O'Rourke ... A S Detsky
J Clin Epidemiol 1989 ; 42(10)1021-4.
Score: 1.169
Critical reading of the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
P Nony ... J P Boissel
Therapie 1995 Jul-Aug; 50(4)339-51.
Score: 1.149
Meta-analysis of calcium bioavailability.
R P Heaney
Am J Ther 2001 Jan-Feb; 8(1)73-4.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
J Benveniste
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)367.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of the carotid artery.
E A Weymuller
Am J Otolaryngol 1993 Sep-Oct; 14(5)375-6.
Score: 1.138
The value of meta-analysis in rheumatology research.
John P A Ioannidis
Autoimmun Rev 2004 Jun; 3 Suppl 1()S57-9.
Score: 1.138
Inherent problems with meta-analysis.
R C Peck
Addiction 1995 Dec; 90(12)1589-91; discussion 1595-601.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and meta-physics.
John B Kostis
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2003 Jan-Feb; 5(1)64-5,75.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of hypertension treatment trials.
Lancet 1990 May; 335(8697)1092-4.
Score: 1.138
Biases in meta-analysis and how to compensate.
R P Lederman
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1992 Jul-Aug; 17(4)215.
Score: 1.138
[Homeopathy; meta-analysis of a shirt-sleeve]
L Offerhaus
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1991 Mar; 135(12)500-2.
Score: 1.138
Can meta-analysis make policy?
C C Mann
Science 1994 Nov; 266(5187)960-2.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis in literature reviews.
V E Pollock
Biol Psychiatry 1993 Sep; 34(6)345-7.
Score: 1.138
ECT results and meta-analysis.
J S Uebersax
Am J Psychiatry 1987 Feb; 144(2)255-6.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
A Koch
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)366-7; author reply 367-8.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis: an overview.
M C Smith ... E Stullenbarger
Nurs Sci Q 1989 ; 2(3)114-5.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis and psychiatric genetics.
Stephen J Pittelli
Am J Psychiatry 2002 Mar; 159(3)496-7.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis and bouillabaisse.
W A Ghali ... W Y Hershman
Ann Intern Med 1996 Sep; 125(6)518-9.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of a test?
G Huszar
Fertil Steril 1999 Feb; 71(2)389-91.
Score: 1.138
[Editorial "meta-analysis"]
G Bettega
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2003 Oct; 104(5)251-2.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis.
I Harvey ... B Toth
Lancet 1993 Apr; 341(8850)964.
Score: 1.138
Correction to article on meta-analysis.
A F Dalrymple
Can J Psychiatry 1991 Nov; 36(9)698.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of oral triptans.
P Tfelt-Hansen
Cephalalgia 2004 Aug; 24(8)688.
Score: 1.138
Comment: clindamycin meta-analysis.
M A Gill
Ann Pharmacother 1996 May; 30(5)548-9.
Score: 1.138
Guidelines for using meta-analysis.
R P Lederman
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1992 Sep-Oct; 17(5)265.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis and patient-controlled analgesia.
B W Brown
J Clin Anesth 1993 May-Jun; 5(3)179-81.
Score: 1.138
[Homeopathy; meta-analysis of a shirtsleeve]
M Bolt
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1991 Apr; 135(17)776.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of intratympanic gentamicin.
Neil S Longridge
Otol Neurotol 2005 May; 26(3)554.
Score: 1.138
The promise and problems of meta-analysis.
J C Bailar
N Engl J Med 1997 Aug; 337(8)559-61.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
M F Kahn
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)365; author reply 367-8.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis in complex diseases.
N E Morton
Clin Exp Allergy 1995 Nov; 25 Suppl 2()110-2.
Score: 1.138
Understanding and evaluating a meta-analysis.
C M Olson
Acad Emerg Med 1994 Jul-Aug; 1(4)392-8.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis for dose-response models.
W Dumouchel
Stat Med 1995 Mar 15-Apr 15; 14(5-7)679-85.
Score: 1.138
The yield of meta-analysis.
R Marchioli ... G Tognoni
Lancet 1998 Mar; 351(9106)915-6.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis in transfusion medicine.
E C Vamvakas
Transfusion 1997 Mar; 37(3)329-45.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of antidepressants in fibromyalgia.
L J Crofford
Curr Rheumatol Rep 2001 Apr; 3(2)115.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis: state-of-the-science.
K Dickersin ... J A Berlin
Epidemiol Rev 1992 ; 14()154-76.
Score: 1.138
An updated meta-analysis with a few surprises.
Norman M Kaplan
Hypertension 2005 Aug; 46(2)257-8.
Score: 1.138
Myeloma, melphalan, and meta-analysis.
D E Bergsagel
J Clin Oncol 1992 Feb; 10(2)178-9.
Score: 1.138
Questionable statistics in meta-analysis.
D Peleg
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000 Jul; 183(1)257-8.
Score: 1.138
What have we learned from meta-analysis?
M Stockler ... A Coates
Med J Aust 1993 Sep; 159(5)291-3.
Score: 1.138
Have you ever meta-analysis you didn't like?
S N Goodman
Ann Intern Med 1991 Feb; 114(3)244-6.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of a test?
P G McDonough
Fertil Steril 1999 Feb; 71(2)391-2.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
P Seed
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)365; author reply 367-8.
Score: 1.138
Cochrane review and meta-analysis.
Robert E Condon
J Am Coll Surg 2004 Mar; 198(3)498; author reply 498-500.
Score: 1.138
Misleading meta-analysis.
Julia Critchley ... Belgin Unal
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003 Jun; 95(6)638; author reply 639.
Score: 1.138
Misleading meta-analysis.
M Egger ... G D Smith
BMJ 1995 Mar; 310(6982)752-4.
Score: 1.138
Integrating research evidence: a commentary on meta-analysis.
J Mintz
J Consult Clin Psychol 1983 Feb; 51(1)71-5.
Score: 1.138
Some limiting factors in meta-analysis.
R L Bangert-Drowns
NIDA Res Monogr 1997 ; 170()234-52.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research.
C D Naylor
BMJ 1997 Sep; 315(7109)617-9.
Score: 1.138
Cancer among farmers: a meta-analysis.
S Milham
Ann Epidemiol 1999 Jan; 9(1)71-2.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis in clinical research.
R D Gelber ... A Goldhirsch
Ann Intern Med 1988 Jan; 108(1)158-9.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis on preexercise stretching.
Ian Shrier
Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004 Oct; 36(10)1832; author reply 1833.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis in clinical medicine.
T C Chalmers
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 1987 ; 99()144-50.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis and methodology review: what's in a name?
A S Cunningham
J Pediatr 1988 Aug; 113(2)328-9.
Score: 1.138
[Importance of meta-analysis in cardiology]
A Castaigne
Therapie 1997 Jan-Feb; 52(1)9-11.
Score: 1.138
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
C Paterson
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)365-6; author reply 367-8.
Score: 1.138
Learning to live with meta-analysis.
M M Fisher
Crit Care Resusc 1999 Mar; 1(1)7-8.
Score: 1.138
Misleading meta-analysis.
M Egger ... G D Smith
BMJ 1995 Sep; 311(7007)753-4.
Score: 1.138
Cumulating evidence from randomized trials: utilizing sequential monitoring boundaries for cumulative meta-analysis.
J M Pogue ... S Yusuf
Control Clin Trials 1997 Dec; 18(6)580-93; discussion 661-6.
Score: 1.115
Meta-analysis and its problems.
H J Eysenck
BMJ 1994 Sep; 309(6957)789-92.
Score: 1.115
A consumer's guide to meta-analysis.
M LaValley
Arthritis Care Res 1997 Jun; 10(3)208-13.
Score: 1.095
Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
Prescrire Int 1998 Jun; 7(35)94-5.
Score: 1.087
Going beyond the narrative summarization of research findings: the meta-analysis approach.
W L Curlette ... K S Cannella
Res Nurs Health 1985 Sep; 8(3)293-301.
Score: 1.081
Misunderstanding meta-analysis.
R L Bangert-Drowns
Eval Health Prof 1995 Sep; 18(3)304-14.
Score: 1.067
Meta-analysis: strategies to strengthen postanesthesia care unit study results.
S Summers
J Post Anesth Nurs 1993 Aug; 8(4)286-9.
Score: 1.061
Issues in meta-analysis: an overview.
A A Bartolucci ... G S Alarcón
Arthritis Care Res 1994 Sep; 7(3)156-60.
Score: 1.052
A note on meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.
Giovanni Casazza
Arch Dermatol 2004 Mar; 140(3)363-4; author reply 364.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
C D Naylor
J Rheumatol 1989 Apr; 16(4)424-6.
Score: 1.039
Failed to fetch article title! Article may not be available.
Score: 1.039
Re: "Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy".
E J Boyko
Am J Epidemiol 1996 Feb; 143(4)406-7.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of beta-blockers in heart failure.
F P Meyer
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001 Dec; 39(12)561-3.
Score: 1.039
Pitfalls in performing meta-analysis: II.
P J McKenzie
Anesthesiology 1993 Aug; 79(2)406-8.
Score: 1.039
Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis.
Laurence C Carmichael
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003 Mar; 167(6)933; author reply 933-4.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of controlled pharmacologic trials.
L S Schneider
Int Psychogeriatr 1996 ; 8 Suppl 3()375-9; discussion 381-2.
Score: 1.039
Advancing evidence-based practice through meta-analysis.
Patricia A Cowan
Nephrol Nurs J 2004 May-Jun; 31(3)343-4, 347.
Score: 1.039
Simpson's paradox in meta-analysis.
J A Hanley ... G Thériault
Epidemiology 2000 Sep; 11(5)613-4.
Score: 1.039
Ceftriaxone and wound infections meta-analysis.
I D Burton
N Z Med J 1991 Mar; 104(908)126.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
A K Vallance ... K A Jobst
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)366; author reply 367-8.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis: Can we mix apples and oranges?
Paul Moayyedi
Am J Gastroenterol 2004 Dec; 99(12)2297-301.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of clinical trials in periodontal research.
A Antczak-Bouckoms
Periodontol 2000 1993 Jun; 2()140-9.
Score: 1.039
Ceftriaxone and wound infections meta-analysis.
J Villiger
N Z Med J 1991 Jun; 104(913)237.
Score: 1.039
Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis.
Thomas L Petty
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003 Mar; 167(6)933; author reply 933-4.
Score: 1.039
Paradoxical interventions: a meta-analysis.
V Shoham-Salomon ... R Rosenthal
J Consult Clin Psychol 1987 Feb; 55(1)22-8.
Score: 1.039
The meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.
J Boissel ... M Cucherat
Eur Radiol 1998 ; 8(3)484-7.
Score: 1.039
Meta-Analysis. Potentials and promise.
M Egger ... G D Smith
BMJ 1997 Nov; 315(7119)1371-4.
Score: 1.039
Reviews of research literature: meta-analysis for synthesizing.
R P Lederman
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1992 May-Jun; 17(3)157.
Score: 1.039
Antihistamine meta-analysis leaves uncertainty.
Gail G Shapiro
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003 Apr; 111(4)695-6.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
E Ernst ... J Barnes
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)366; author reply 367-8.
Score: 1.039
Selecting appropriate techniques for meta-analysis.
G S Persinger
Am J Hosp Pharm 1986 Mar; 43(3)606, 611.
Score: 1.039
Cranial electrostimulation for headache: meta-analysis.
D C McCrory
J Nerv Ment Dis 1997 Dec; 185(12)766-7.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis.
M H Savitz ... L I Malis
Neurosurgery 1995 May; 36(5)1057-8.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of prevalence of hypertension in India.
R Gupta
Indian Heart J 1997 Jul-Aug; 49(4)450.
Score: 1.039
Improving meta-analysis for policy purposes.
L V Hedges
NIDA Res Monogr 1997 ; 170()202-15.
Score: 1.039
Quality-of-life meta-analysis: why treat it differently?
Jeff A Sloan
J Clin Oncol 2003 Apr; 21(7)1422.
Score: 1.039
Human albumin meta-analysis.
Ian Seppelt ... Anthony Burrell
Crit Care Med 2005 Apr; 33(4)914-5; author reply 915-7.
Score: 1.039
Corrections to the nifedipine meta-analysis.
C D Furberg ... B M Psaty
Circulation 1996 Apr; 93(7)1475-6.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis, part I.
Douglas Y Rowland ... Sara M Debanne
Gastrointest Endosc 2002 Apr; 55(4)612-3.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis in aid of alcohol studies.
G Edwards
Br J Addict 1991 Oct; 86(10)1189-90.
Score: 1.039
[Advantages of meta-analysis of clinical trials]
J P Boissel
Therapie 1994 May-Jun; 49(3)161-4.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis: a method for synthesizing research.
R B D'Agostino ... M Weintraub
Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995 Dec; 58(6)605-16.
Score: 1.039
Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis.
Tihomir Stefanec
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003 Mar; 167(6)934; author reply 934-5.
Score: 1.039
A meta-analysis of the treatment of intermittent claudication.
R Neill
J Fam Pract 1999 Jun; 48(6)418-9.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis redux-steroids and meningitis revisited.
P L Havens
West J Med 1992 Jul; 157(1)84-6.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis as a clinical tool in nephrology.
B L Kasiske
Kidney Int 1998 Apr; 53(4)819-25.
Score: 1.039
Where now for meta-analysis?
Matthias Egger ... George Davey Smith
Int J Epidemiol 2002 Feb; 31(1)1-5.
Score: 1.039
Growing pains of meta-analysis.
I Sim ... M A Hlatky
BMJ 1996 Sep; 313(7059)702-3.
Score: 1.039
Clinical trials and meta-analysis. What do they do for us?
J P Kassirer
N Engl J Med 1992 Jul; 327(4)273-4.
Score: 1.039
Author defends meta-analysis that was criticised.
F P Cappuccio
BMJ 1999 Jul; 319(7204)256.
Score: 1.039
Magnesium, myocardial infarction, meta-analysis and megatrials.
Drug Ther Bull 1995 Apr; 33(4)25-7.
Score: 1.039
[Criticism against the atenolol meta-analysis remains]
Kent Forsén
Lakartidningen 2005 Feb 7-13; 102(6)412, 414; discussion 414-5.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis and the scientific research that precedes it.
B A Sorofman ... G Milavetz
Ann Pharmacother 1994 Nov; 28(11)1290-1.
Score: 1.039
Facilitating meta-analysis in nursing.
Elizabeth H Anderson ... Cheryl Tatano Beck
Nurs Res 2003 Jan-Feb; 52(1)1.
Score: 1.039
A meta-analysis of estrogen replacement and breast cancer.
JAMA 1991 Sep; 266(10)1358-60.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of homoeopathy trials.
M Bobak ... A Donald
Lancet 1998 Jan; 351(9099)368.
Score: 1.039
Where to with meta-analysis?--First, do no harm.
Barbara Silverstein
Scand J Work Environ Health 2003 Dec; 29(6)442-3.
Score: 1.039
Further interpretation of the PORT meta-analysis.
John Armstrong
Lancet Oncol 2002 Dec; 3(12)718.
Score: 1.039
Publication bias and meta-analysis.
S Gilbody ... A House
Br J Psychiatry 1995 Aug; 167(2)266.
Score: 1.039
Medication and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis.
S Thurber ... C E Walker
J Gen Psychol 1983 Jan; 108(1st Half)79-86.
Score: 1.039
Otitis media meta-analysis.
Maroeska M Rovers ... Gerhard A Zielhuis
Pediatrics 2004 Aug; 114(2)508-9; author reply 508-9.
Score: 1.039
The use and misuse of meta-analysis in clinical medicine.
R Bergström
J Intern Med 1994 Jul; 236(1)3-6.
Score: 1.039
Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis.
Nicola Petrucci
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003 Mar; 167(6)935; author reply 935-6.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis: the quantitative approach to research review.
S S Ellenberg
Semin Oncol 1988 Oct; 15(5)472-81.
Score: 1.039
Post-operative pulmonary embolism and meta-analysis.
F Toulemonde
Thromb Res 1992 Jul; 67(2)275-6.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis, Part II.
Douglas Y Rowland ... Sara M Debanne
Gastrointest Endosc 2002 May; 55(6)772-4.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of prevalence of hypertension in India.
A Indrayan
Indian Heart J 1997 May-Jun; 49(3)337-8.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of recombinant and urinary FSH.
P R Koninckx
Hum Reprod 2001 Jan; 16(1)196-198.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis: a review of pros and cons.
J H Abramson
Public Health Rev 1990-1991; 18(1)1-47.
Score: 1.039
Fraudulent studies and meta-analysis.
J Sobal ... B R Deforge
JAMA 1988 Aug; 260(6)791-2.
Score: 1.039
NHS opens meta-analysis centre.
I Mundell
Nature 1992 Oct; 359(6397)660.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of epidemiological studies of carcinogenesis.
J Peto
IARC Sci Publ 1992 ; (116)571-7.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis of the timing of haemorrhage after tonsillectomy.
P J Robb
Clin Otolaryngol 2006 Feb; 31(1)81-2.
Score: 1.039
The potential and limitations of meta-analysis.
T D Spector ... S G Thompson
J Epidemiol Community Health 1991 Jun; 45(2)89-92.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis: a perspective for research synthesis.
M C Smith ... D C Naftel
Image J Nurs Sch 1984 ; 16(1)9-13.
Score: 1.039
[Argument over meta-analysis in medicine]
Y Lin ... L Li
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 1999 Feb; 20(1)53-4.
Score: 1.039
Meta-analysis with longitudinal studies: controlling for analytical bias.
R T Connis ... R D Hendricks
Psychol Rep 1996 Dec; 79(3 Pt 2)1383-6.
Score: 1.034
Meta-analysis: neither quick nor easy.
Nancy G Berman ... Robert A Parker
BMC Med Res Methodol 2002 Aug; 2()10.
Score: 1.030
Meta-analysis of FK 506 and mycophenolate mofetil refractory rejection trials in renal transplantation. Refractory Rejection Meta-Analysis Study Group.
E S Woodle ... G M Danovitch
Transplant Proc 1998 Jun; 30(4)1297-8.
Score: 1.027
Meta-analysis of clinical trials: a consumer's guide.
N L Geller ... M Proschan
J Biopharm Stat 1996 Nov; 6(4)377-94.
Score: 1.023
A public health nurse's guide to reading meta-analysis research reports.
V S Conn ... J M Armer
Public Health Nurs 1994 Jun; 11(3)163-7.
Score: 1.021
Meta-analysis for descriptive research.
N R Reynolds ... J S Stevenson
Res Nurs Health 1992 Dec; 15(6)467-75.
Score: 1.016
[Meta-analysis: the science of review in Neurology]
M F Allam ... R F-C Navajas
Rev Neurol 2005 Feb 16-28; 40(4)222-8.
Score: 1.013
Meta-analysis for dermatologists.
B A Lycka
Int J Dermatol 1990 Apr; 29(3)229-31.
Score: 1.009
Re: "Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies".
M Clarke ... L Stewart
Am J Epidemiol 1998 Jul; 148(1)102-3.
Score: 1.007
Meta-analysis: overview and application to clinical nursing practice.
C T Beck
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1995 Feb; 24(2)131-5.
Score: 1.002
Uses and abuses of meta-analysis.
M Egger ... J A Sterne
Clin Med 2001 Nov-Dec; 1(6)478-84.
Score: 0.999
Meta-analysis. A quantitative approach to research integration.
S B Thacker
JAMA 1988 Mar; 259(11)1685-9.
Score: 0.996
Meta-analysis: the glass eye of evidence-based practice?
P Rodger W Gregson ... Mark Avis
Nurs Inq 2002 Mar; 9(1)24-30.
Score: 0.990
Meta-analysis. A useful tool for the spine researcher.
J K Haselkorn ... R A Deyo
Spine 1994 Sep; 19(18 Suppl)2076S-2082S.
Score: 0.983
Meta-analysis: a tool for medical and scientific discoveries.
C L Schell ... R J Rathe
Bull Med Libr Assoc 1992 Jul; 80(3)219-22.
Score: 0.979
Meta-analysis and prospective meta-analysis in childhood leukemia clinical research.
J J Shuster ... P W Gieser
Ann Oncol 1996 Dec; 7(10)1009-14.
Score: 0.972
[Meta-analysis in medicine]
J Hendl
Cas Lek Cesk 2002 Apr; 141(8)235-9.
Score: 0.971
Meta-analysis and occupational epidemiology.
J E Myers ... M L Thompson
Occup Med (Lond) 1998 Feb; 48(2)99-101.
Score: 0.970
An overview of statistical issues and methods of meta-analysis.
J E Schmid ... L M LaVange
J Biopharm Stat 1991 ; 1(1)103-20.
Score: 0.969
Meta-analysis for the refinement of gerontological nursing research and theory.
V F Engle ... M J Graney
J Gerontol Nurs 1990 Sep; 16(9)12-5.
Score: 0.965
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
G Lewis ... M Hotopp
Psychol Med 1997 Jan; 27(1)3-7.
Score: 0.962
[Cumulative meta-analysis as ultimate truth]
F R Rosendaal ... J J van Everdingen
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1993 Aug; 137(32)1591-4.
Score: 0.962
Apomorphine test in the assessment of parkinsonian patients: a meta-analysis.
A J Hughes
Adv Neurol 1999 ; 80()363-8.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century.
A R Feinstein
J Clin Epidemiol 1995 Jan; 48(1)71-9.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of prevention of nonvertebral fractures by alendronate.
S D Ross
JAMA 1997 Aug; 278(8)631; author reply 631-2.
Score: 0.962
Occupational exposures and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
S K Seilkop
Occup Environ Med 2001 Jan; 58(1)63-4.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of the cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber.
A S Truswell
Am J Clin Nutr 1999 Nov; 70(5)942-3.
Score: 0.962
Re: Meta-analysis of asbestos and gastrointestinal cancer.
R W Morgan
Am J Ind Med 1991 ; 19(3)407-11.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis and the integration of research in special education.
K A Kavale ... G V Glass
J Learn Disabil 1981 Nov; 14(9)531-8.
Score: 0.962
A meta-analysis of family intervention studies in schizophrenia.
Håvard Bentsen
Psychol Med 2003 May; 33(4)755-6; author reply 756-8.
Score: 0.962
A note on statistical inference in meta-analysis.
P Fonagy ... A C Higgitt
Behav Res Ther 1983 ; 21(1)87-88.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
M L Smith ... G V Glass
Am Psychol 1977 Sep; 32(9)752-60.
Score: 0.962
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.
S Halligan
Clin Radiol 2005 Sep; 60(9)977-9.
Score: 0.962
[Albumin, evidence and meta-analysis: can the judgement be appealed?]
S Rosthøj
Ugeskr Laeger 2001 Mar; 163(12)1717-20.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of abciximab trials confirms benefit.
Norman E Lepor
Rev Cardiovasc Med 2005 ; 6(3)180-1.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of data from experimental research.
R K Olson ... A M Becker
Kans Nurse 1990 Nov-Dec; 65(10)1.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis and the critical appraisal of infertility literature.
E G Hughes
Fertil Steril 1992 Feb; 57(2)275-7.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: a third alternative for student research experience.
K A Lee
Nurse Educ 1988 Jul-Aug; 13(4)30-3.
Score: 0.962
A meta-analysis of clinical trials of spinal manipulation.
R L Rupert
J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992 Sep; 15(7)477-9.
Score: 0.962
Exercise therapy for nonspecific low-back pain: a meta-analysis.
Lawrence Hart
Clin J Sport Med 2006 Mar; 16(2)189-90.
Score: 0.962
Applying a meta-analysis to daily clinical practice.
W F Miser
J Am Board Fam Pract 2000 May-Jun; 13(3)201-10.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis for the practicing obstetrician-gynecologist.
S B Thacker ... H B Peterson
Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998 Jun; 41(2)275-81.
Score: 0.962
A pitfall in the meta-analysis of hazard ratios.
U R Abel ... L Edler
Control Clin Trials 1988 Jun; 9(2)149-51.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis methodology: the battle continues.
Jonathan Belsey ... James U Adelman
Headache 2003 Nov-Dec; 43(10)1119-21; author reply 1121.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis in deriving summary estimates of test performance.
M Helfand
Med Decis Making 1993 Jul-Sep; 13(3)182-3.
Score: 0.962
Pitfalls in performing meta-analysis: I.
M S Higgins ... J L Stiff
Anesthesiology 1993 Aug; 79(2)405.
Score: 0.962
Treatment programs for offenders. Meta-analysis, "what works," and beyond.
C R Hollin
Int J Law Psychiatry 1999 May-Aug; 22(3-4)361-72.
Score: 0.962
Bias in meta-analysis.
Helmut Kiene ... Tido von Schön-Angerer
Homeopathy 2006 Jan; 95(1)54.
Score: 0.962
Commentary on meta-analysis in clinical trials.
J Berlin ... T C Chalmers
Hepatology 1988 May-Jun; 8(3)690-1.
Score: 0.962
Using meta-analysis to answer clinical questions.
R J Laheij
JAMA 2001 Dec; 286(21)2669; author reply 2669-70.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of prevention of nonvertebral fractures by alendronate.
M Prostko
JAMA 1997 Aug; 278(8)631; author reply 631-2.
Score: 0.962
Spinal epidural abscess: a meta-analysis of 915 patients.
Y Erşahin
Neurosurg Rev 2001 Jul; 24(2-3)156.
Score: 0.962
[Noticeable meta-analysis of atenolol does not cover all aspects]
Kent Forsén
Lakartidningen 2005 Jan 3-16; 102(1-2)61-3.
Score: 0.962
Is meta-analysis clinically useful for perianesthesia nurses.
Michael Selph
J Perianesth Nurs 2002 Feb; 17(1)3.
Score: 0.962
The variance accounted for in meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcomes.
V L Willson
Am Psychol 1980 May; 35(5)467.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: greater than the sum of its parts?
M J Souter ... D F Signorini
Br J Anaesth 1997 Oct; 79(4)420-1.
Score: 0.962
Thin-layer cervical cytology: a new meta-analysis.
Jörg Obwegeser ... Volker Schneider
Lancet 2006 Jan; 367(9505)88-9.
Score: 0.962
Spinal hematoma: a literature survey with meta-analysis of 613 patients.
Hinnerk F W Wulf
Neurosurg Rev 2003 Jan; 26(1)51.
Score: 0.962
Is meta-analysis a metaphysical or a scientific method?
R Arriagada ... J P Pignon
Chest 2000 Sep; 118(3)832-4.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: appropriate tool for the integration of nursing research?
M R Lynn
Nurs Res 1989 Sep-Oct; 38(5)302-5.
Score: 0.962
The dexamethasone suppression test as an indicator of suicide: a meta-analysis.
D Lester
Pharmacopsychiatry 1992 Nov; 25(6)265-70.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis in oral health care.
A J Palmer ... P P Sendi
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999 Feb; 87(2)135-41.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of tidal volumes in ARDS.
Christopher Parshuram ... Brian Kavanagh
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003 Mar; 167(5)798; author reply 798-800.
Score: 0.962
Antibiotics for acute bronchitis: a meta-analysis.
F M Chen ... L Church
J Fam Pract 1999 Mar; 48(3)171.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of alcohol and risk of breast cancer.
L Rosenberg
JAMA 1989 Jan; 261(3)383.
Score: 0.962
Some metrical issues with meta-analysis of therapy effects.
T Lund
Scand J Psychol 1988 ; 29(1)1-8.
Score: 0.962
Applicability of data in antibiotic prophylaxis meta-analysis.
S A Thiele
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 Jul; 171(1)281-2.
Score: 0.962
Measurement of quality of primary studies for meta-analysis.
S A Brown
Nurs Res 1991 Nov-Dec; 40(6)352-5.
Score: 0.962
Spinal hematoma: a literature survey with meta-analysis of 613 patients.
Ulrich Kunz
Neurosurg Rev 2003 Jan; 26(1)52.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis, overviews and publication bias.
P Solomon ... J Hutton
Stat Methods Med Res 2001 Aug; 10(4)245-50.
Score: 0.962
Is meta-analysis really meta-physics?
M Machtay ... E Glatstein
Chest 1999 Aug; 116(2)539-42.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: reconciling the results of independent studies.
I Olkin
Stat Med 1995 Mar 15-Apr 15; 14(5-7)457-72.
Score: 0.962
Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies.
C F Bond ... L J Titus
Psychol Bull 1983 Sep; 94(2)265-92.
Score: 0.962
Spinal hematoma: a literature survey with meta-analysis of 613 patients.
Stefan A Rath
Neurosurg Rev 2003 Jan; 26(1)50.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in cancer.
M Buyse
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1993 Dec; 20(16)2501-6.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis based on standardized effects is unreliable.
Peter Cummings
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004 Jun; 158(6)595-7.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: an introduction and point of view.
H P Friedman ... J D Goldberg
Hepatology 1996 Apr; 23(4)917-28.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: principles and procedures.
M Egger ... A N Phillips
BMJ 1997 Dec; 315(7121)1533-7.
Score: 0.962
Univariate statistical models for meta-analysis.
I L Abraham ... S Schultz
Nurs Res 1983 Sep-Oct; 32(5)312-5.
Score: 0.962
[The Oxford meta-analysis of 2000: reflections and comments]
Giorgio Mustacchi
Tumori 2005 Sep-Oct; 91(5)1-9.
Score: 0.962
Further analysis of a meta-analysis.
L S Schneider ... S Lyness
J Am Geriatr Soc 1991 Apr; 39(4)441-2.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis and models of substance abuse prevention.
B J Becker
NIDA Res Monogr 1997 ; 170()96-119.
Score: 0.962
Calculation errors in meta-analysis.
A Messori ... N Martini
Ann Intern Med 1993 Jan; 118(1)77-8.
Score: 0.962
Saw palmetto for BPH: a review of a meta-analysis.
Tracy Onega
JAAPA 2002 May; 15(5)59-60, 63-4.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis: formulation and interpretation.
Jeffrey A Gliner ... Robert J Harmon
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003 Nov; 42(11)1376-9.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis of calcium bioavailability.
H H Albrecht ... E M Krusinka
Am J Ther 2001 Jan-Feb; 8(1)74-7.
Score: 0.962
Meta-analysis in albumin dialysis: are we really ready for it?
Jan Stange
Liver Transpl 2004 Sep; 10(9)1107-8.
Score: 0.962
A difficult step in meta-analysis: refining the search.
Mihai-Sergiu Jalba
Chest 2003 Mar; 123(3)960; author reply 960-1.
Score: 0.962
Extended-interval aminoglycoside administration for children: a meta-analysis.
Richard E Berger
J Urol 2005 Apr; 173(4)1192.
Score: 0.962
Value and limitation of meta-analysis.
M Verstraete
Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2002 Sep-Dec; 32(5-6)278-81.
Score: 0.957
Meta-analysis: an overview.
B Mullen ... M Mullen
Nutrition 1990 May-Jun; 6(3)270-1.
Score: 0.953
Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?
C Anello ... J L Fleiss
J Clin Epidemiol 1995 Jan; 48(1)109-16; discussion 117-8.
Score: 0.951
Use of meta-analysis as a teaching strategy in nursing research courses.
C T Beck
J Nurs Educ 1997 Feb; 36(2)87-90.
Score: 0.947
[Meta-analyses of randomized trials in o